Every funding model is a mirror of values. It reveals whether we prioritise compliance or connection, efficiency or equity. In early childhood education (ECE), the current system still reflects the priorities of the 1980s: attendance counts and administrative oversight. According to the Ministry of Education (2025), the ECE Funding Review (MAG 2025) is designed to modernise these settings to reflect present-day realities, from workforce wellbeing to child protection.
Funding decisions are moral decisions. As OECD (2021) observed in Starting Strong VI, what nations fund in early childhood determines how they value their youngest citizens. If we want a sector grounded in dignity and safety, our funding must say so.
Funding is philosophy in numbers. Every dollar reflects a decision about dignity.
1 - How Funding Shapes Behaviour
The way funding flows shapes what leaders prioritise. When funding rewards attendance compliance, services become data collectors instead of relationship builders. When it funds time for supervision, mentoring, and reflection, services become communities of care.
Education Counts (2023) shows that administrative demands have increased year-on-year, while quality indicators remain static. The Teaching Council of Aotearoa NZ (2024) highlights in Our Code, Our Standards that professional reflection and cultural care are ethical responsibilities, yet these are not resourced duties. A funding model that values relational practice would look different: more time, less paperwork, and measurable protective outcomes.
2 - The Ethics Behind the Equation
Budgets are moral documents. They determine whether tamariki are taught by rested, well-paid educators or by overstretched teams covering gaps. Equity cannot exist where exhaustion is normal. Funding must acknowledge the cost of care: wages that sustain, ratios that allow attentiveness, and time that protects.
As OECD (2021) notes, high-quality ECE systems invest in the conditions that enable educators to focus on children, not compliance. This is not charity; it is sound economics. A well-supported workforce reduces turnover, increases safety vigilance, and strengthens long-term outcomes for children.
3 - Affordability, Access, and Integrity
Affordability is an ethical issue. When costs exclude families, participation data misrepresents inclusion. The Ministry of Education (2024) found that affordability challenges still restrict consistent access for Māori and Pacific families. Equity funding and fee-stabilisation mechanisms would ensure that no child’s participation depends on their parents’ ability to pay.
Integrity in funding means aligning financial levers with social purpose. It ensures that access, diversity, and protection are not competing goals but complementary measures of a just system.
4 - Administrative Drift
Over time, compliance has become an end in itself. The Regulatory Review of ECE (Ministry of Education, 2024) confirms that the sector is spending more time proving quality than practising it. Attendance coding, reporting cycles, and audit trails absorb hours that could be used to notice the quiet cues of distress or to build relationships with whānau.
The ECE Funding Review (MAG 2025) can simplify these processes and refocus investment on protective practice. When compliance is risk-based and relational, it strengthens safety rather than consuming time.
If it does not reduce risk or build trust, it should not take time.
5 - A Compass for Change
Funding reform must be guided by a moral compass: fairness, safety, and sustainability. The Teaching Council (2024) provides that compass through Our Code, Our Standards, which calls for leaders to uphold care and collective responsibility. The Funding Review can turn these ethics into system design.
When funding measures what we truly value, wellbeing, connection, and protection, it redefines quality not as compliance, but as care.
If the budget does not reflect our values, it will shape them instead.
---
Reflection Prompts
- What story does your current funding model tell about what your service values most?
- How could funding mechanisms be simplified to restore time for connection and care?
- Where do ethics and economics collide in your everyday decision-making?
Inline References
- Ministry of Education (2025). ECE Funding Review (MAG 2025). education.govt.nz.
- OECD (2021). Starting Strong VI: Supporting Meaningful Access and Quality in ECEC. oecd.org.
- Teaching Council of Aotearoa New Zealand (2024). Our Code, Our Standards: The Code of Professional Responsibility and Standards for the Teaching Profession. teachingcouncil.nz.
- Education Counts (2023). ECE Participation Data and Programme Evaluation. educationcounts.govt.nz.
- Ministry of Education (2024). Regulatory Review of Early Childhood Education. education.govt.nz.